Our goal is reduced machine detection through expressive surfaces. The work tests one locked texture, garment revision, model build, threshold, camera, distance, lighting condition, motion state, and production batch at a time. Internal digital studies are not physical-product validation.
The normalized 2,048px masters below were hash-locked before inference and paired with exact in-mask RGB-pixel-permutation controls. Both pinned detector builds retained person detection on every S4 unit. No S4 candidate qualified.
HARD RESULT / NO CANDIDATE MADE A PERSON UNDETECTED BY BOTH MODELS. DETR DETECTED 45/45 CANDIDATE PERSON UNITS; YOLO DETECTED 43/45. THE TWO YOLO MISSES OCCURRED ON ONE SYNTHETIC SCENE AND DID NOT REPLICATE IN THE SECOND. TWO SYNTHETIC STILLS, TWO BUILDS, ONE SCALE, AND ONE SEAM STATE CANNOT VERIFY “AI CANNOT SEE IT.”
These image-generated masters expand recursive, quasiperiodic, reaction-diffusion, multiscale, interference, network, and ornate boundary hypotheses. Their hashes and prompts are frozen. Preorders record demand; matched-control detector screening records function.
The prompts requested seamless-style continuity, but measured opposing-edge RMSE was nonzero for all twelve generated sources. NULLRADIAL therefore labels them seam-variable candidates—not exact repeats. S3 preregisters continuous, phase-shifted, and panel-composed variants so seam behavior is tested instead of assumed.
THE PATTERN GETS ATTENTION. THE PROOF SYSTEM BUILDS VALUE.
The literature shows that large, optimized physical patterns can change outcomes on particular detectors under particular conditions. It also shows brittle transfer, side-view failures, range limits, metric reversals, and a gulf between a digital render and cloth in motion. NULLRADIAL is building the versioned candidate, manufacturing, and qualification layer between those facts and a sellable surface system.
S2 / release candidates
ORNATE BY DESIGN. LOCKED FOR CONSEQUENCE.
Each 2,048-pixel master has exact opposing edges and a SHA-256 identity. The screen compares candidate layouts with smooth, pixel-multiset-matched spectral surrogates. That comparison does not isolate radiality causally.
S2 used four scenes and two detector families. Two scenes were already-patterned screenshots. Detector outputs—not independent human annotations—served as the pseudo-baseline. The statistics prioritize swatches; they do not estimate product recall, precision, AP, tracking, identity, or safety performance.
Question / does bigger win?
NO SINGLE SCALE WON. COVERAGE IS NOT A FREE RESULT.
Across all three candidates, macro repeats had the largest mean point estimate. The single strongest candidate-scale cell was Broken Halo at micro scale. Standard scale split the detector-family means. The honest answer is candidate-specific—and physical pixel footprint must be held equal before treating size as causal.
Scale
Factor
Mean layout contrast
YOLO
DETR
Agreement
Macro
1.80×
+0.050
+0.067
+0.038
Both family means positive
Micro
0.55×
+0.037
+0.025
+0.046
Both family means positive
Standard
1.00×
+0.034
−0.038
+0.089
Detector means disagree
01 / REPEAT
EXACT EDGES ARE A CONTROL.
They make roll goods, scale comparisons, cut maps, and version checks cleaner. Every S2 master has zero opposite-edge pixel error.
02 / SEAM
SEWN CONTINUITY IS UNPROVEN.
No core apparel study establishes that an invisible image seam survives garment seams, feed error, stretch, folds, abrasion, or laundering.
03 / ORNAMENT
AESTHETICS CAN ENTER THE SCREEN.
Ornate candidates produced measurable but inconsistent digital differences. Ornament itself is not the cause, and physical transfer remains open.
Evidence ladder
EVERY CLAIM HAS AN ADDRESS.
No percentage travels without its candidate, material, model, camera, conditions, controls, sample unit, and uncertainty. A changed dependency creates a new attempt—not a better past.
01
RESEARCH-DERIVED
A literature-backed candidate with locked art. No NULLRADIAL performance result.
02
DIGITALLY SCREENED
Synthetic comparison on named frozen builds. Useful for prioritization, not a product claim.
03
ROBUSTNESS-SCREENED
Held-out scenes, multiple controls, tasks, transformations, and at least three model families.
04
PHYSICAL PROTOTYPE
Printed lot tested across fit, folds, seams, light, motion, distance, wash, and weather.
05
CONTROLLED LAB RESULT
Preregistered study with independent ground truth, clustered statistics, and all failures.
06
INDEPENDENTLY REPLICATED
New data and blinded samples tested by a team that did not optimize the candidate.
Awarded only when an independent laboratory executes the frozen Test Card and a locked production article meets its predeclared threshold. The mark prints the model build, camera, threshold, range, lighting, motion, garment revision, lot, uncertainty, and expiration. It never travels beyond that address.
One candidate, scale, substrate, construction, print lot, primary endpoint, and analysis.
02
CAPTURE
New consenting participants or mannequins; new scenes; three cameras; light, view, motion, folds, seams, and distance.
03
MEASURE
Independent ground truth, four frozen builds across at least three model families, clustered statistics, and every failure.
04
REPLICATE
A separate team receives coded samples from a new lot and runs the sealed protocol without outcome-driven changes.
Independent tester map
WE BUILT THE BRIEF. NOW FIND THE FRICTION.
No organization listed has agreed to test or endorse NULLRADIAL. The exact protocol, accreditation scope, sample custody, raw-data rights, and publication of null results must be confirmed in writing.
Preliminary IP direction / details held for counsel
THE BROAD IDEA IS CROWDED. THE SYSTEM MAY NOT BE.
A non-exhaustive landscape found close prior art around adversarial clothing, tiled motifs, seam-spanning graphics, multi-model testing, silver textiles, and provenance ledgers. Four narrower manufacturing and qualification invention-disclosure tracks are now on counsel hold. These are research hypotheses—not patentability opinions. Enabling details, alternatives, and claim structures are intentionally absent from this public page pending licensed patent counsel and a filing decision.